On 11/6/15 11:34 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 12:52 AM, Michael Paquier
> wrote:
>>> I guess I'm wondering whether there's really enough of this to need
>>> its own category.
>>
>> We have a category "Code comments" as well. Let's give it a shot so I
>> am adding it. We could al
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 12:52 AM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
>> I guess I'm wondering whether there's really enough of this to need
>> its own category.
>
> We have a category "Code comments" as well. Let's give it a shot so I
> am adding it. We could always remove it later if necessary.
Ugh, OK, what
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
"Refactoring" seems rather a narrow definition of what might show up
in such a category, btw. Maybe "Code Beautificati
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>>> "Refactoring" seems rather a narrow definition of what might show up
>>> in such a category, btw. Maybe "Code Beautification" would be a
>>> suitable title? I'm bikeshedding thou
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>> "Refactoring" seems rather a narrow definition of what might show up
>> in such a category, btw. Maybe "Code Beautification" would be a
>> suitable title? I'm bikeshedding though.
>
> I think that there is value in limiting the number of
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Ditto. Bug fixes are not at all like refactoring --- in particular, we'd
> usually not consider refactoring as fit material for back-patching.
>
> "Refactoring" seems rather a narrow definition of what might show up
> in such a category, btw. Ma
On 10/29/2015 01:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier writes:
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>>> I think that within the CF app, we should either rename the patch
>>> topic "Bug Fixes" to "Bug Fixes/Refactoring", or introduce a new
>>> "Refactoring" topic. I prefer
Michael Paquier writes:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>> I think that within the CF app, we should either rename the patch
>> topic "Bug Fixes" to "Bug Fixes/Refactoring", or introduce a new
>> "Refactoring" topic. I prefer the first approach.
> I would vote for the s
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> > I think that within the CF app, we should either rename the patch
> > topic "Bug Fixes" to "Bug Fixes/Refactoring", or introduce a new
> > "Refactoring" topic. I prefer the f
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> I think that within the CF app, we should either rename the patch
> topic "Bug Fixes" to "Bug Fixes/Refactoring", or introduce a new
> "Refactoring" topic. I prefer the first approach.
I would vote for the second approach, with a separate
I think that within the CF app, we should either rename the patch
topic "Bug Fixes" to "Bug Fixes/Refactoring", or introduce a new
"Refactoring" topic. I prefer the first approach.
--
Peter Geoghegan
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
11 matches
Mail list logo
