On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 10:54 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
>>> I think it will be better if users can have an option to checksum clog
>>> pages. However, I think that will need a change in page (CLOG-page) format
>>> which migh
Robert Haas writes:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
>> I think it will be better if users can have an option to checksum clog
>> pages. However, I think that will need a change in page (CLOG-page) format
>> which might not be a trivial work to accomplish.
> Doesn't the pd_
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> I think it will be better if users can have an option to checksum clog
> pages. However, I think that will need a change in page (CLOG-page) format
> which might not be a trivial work to accomplish.
Doesn't the pd_checksum field exist on SLRU
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 8:43 PM, Alex Ignatov
> wrote:
>
>> Why we don't have checksums on clog files.
>>
>> We have checksum on pg_control, optional checksumming on data files, some
>> form of checksumming on wal's. But why we don't have any c
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 8:43 PM, Alex Ignatov
wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Why we don't have checksums on clog files.
>
> We have checksum on pg_control, optional checksumming on data files, some
> form of checksumming on wal's. But why we don't have any checksumming on
> clogs. Corruptions on clogs lead t
Hello!
Why we don't have checksums on clog files.
We have checksum on pg_control, optional checksumming on data files,
some form of checksumming on wal's. But why we don't have any
checksumming on clogs. Corruptions on clogs lead to transaction
visisbility problems and database consistency vi
