Yusuf Goolamabbas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bruce, haven't followed the thread completely. Accessing the web archive
> is slow from Hong Kong but I just wanted to point you to this lkml post
> which shows why O_SYNC is much faster than fsync (at least on ext3)
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=
Yusuf Goolamabbas wrote:
I sent this to Bruce but forgot to cc pgsql-hackers, The patches are
likely to go into 2.6.6. People interested in extremely safe fsync
writes should also follow the IDE barrier thread and the true fsync() in
Linux on IDE thread
Actually the most interesting part of the
I sent this to Bruce but forgot to cc pgsql-hackers, The patches are
likely to go into 2.6.6. People interested in extremely safe fsync
writes should also follow the IDE barrier thread and the true fsync() in
Linux on IDE thread
- Forwarded message from Yusuf Goolamabbas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --
