Robert Treat wrote:
> On Thursday 03 March 2005 19:08, Neil Conway wrote:
> > Thomas F.O'Connell wrote:
> > committers, myself included, deserve some blame for not making more
> > rapid progress on the queue of unapplied patches for 8.1. In the
> > meanwhile, the queue should be easier for folks to
On Thursday 03 March 2005 19:08, Neil Conway wrote:
> Thomas F.O'Connell wrote:
> committers, myself included, deserve some blame for not making more
> rapid progress on the queue of unapplied patches for 8.1. In the
> meanwhile, the queue should be easier for folks to find (why is the
> "pgpatches
Thomas F.O'Connell wrote:
I have a feeling Bruce was referring to item 1.4:
http://developer.postgresql.org/readtext.php?src/FAQ/
FAQ_DEV.html+Developers-FAQ#1.4
It has never been standard practice to ask for comments before the
development of small features, such as this one. The recently duplic
I have a feeling Bruce was referring to item 1.4:
http://developer.postgresql.org/readtext.php?src/FAQ/
FAQ_DEV.html+Developers-FAQ#1.4
-tfo
--
Thomas F. O'Connell
Co-Founder, Information Architect
Sitening, LLC
http://www.sitening.com/
110 30th Avenue North, Suite 6
Nashville, TN 37203-6320
615-
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Have you read the developer's FAQ. It is a requirement to get involved.
How does the developer's FAQ address this concern?
-Neil
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have you read the developer's FAQ. It is a requirement to get involved.
---
Matthias Schmidt wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> I have submitted a patch which does exactly this. Somebody edited it
> and Bruce put it on
> the queue for 8.
Hi *,
I have submitted a patch which does exactly this. Somebody edited it
and Bruce put it on
the queue for 8.1.
Now we both did the same work twice. This is a good example how a
public accessible
Bugtracker and TODO-List where one can claim things (or get assigned to
some workitem)
can save v
