* Dean Rasheed (dean.a.rash...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Yeah OK, fair point. Here are some tests that cover that code path.
> I've also thrown in a test with prepared statements, although that
> case was already working, it seemed worth checking.
Applied and backpatched, thanks!
Stephen
sign
Dean,
* Dean Rasheed (dean.a.rash...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On 20 September 2014 14:08, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 7:03 AM, Dean Rasheed
> > wrote:
> >> Fortunately it looks pretty trivial though. The patch attached fixes
> >> the above test cases.
> >> Obviously this needs
On 20 September 2014 14:08, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 7:03 AM, Dean Rasheed
> wrote:
>> Fortunately it looks pretty trivial though. The patch attached fixes
>> the above test cases.
>> Obviously this needs to be fixed in 9.4 and HEAD.
> Wouldn't it be better if bundled wit
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 7:03 AM, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> Fortunately it looks pretty trivial though. The patch attached fixes
> the above test cases.
> Obviously this needs to be fixed in 9.4 and HEAD.
Wouldn't it be better if bundled with some regression tests?
--
Michael
--
Sent via pgsql-hack
On 20 September 2014 06:13, Andrew Gierth wrote:
>> "Adam" == Brightwell, Adam
>> writes:
>
> Adam> At any rate, this appears to be a previously existing issue
> Adam> with WITH CHECK OPTION. Thoughts?
>
> It's definitely an existing issue; you can reproduce it more simply,
> no need
