On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 07:18:17PM -0800, John Smith wrote:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-10/msg01468.php,
>
> "... I very much want to encourage authors of new Resource Managers and it
> looks like we may be getting at least 3 new RMs that produce WAL
> records: hash indexes
>
> There is absolutely 0 value in tackling that until someone can fix
> hash's performance problems. If there is no real-world scenario for
> using it ... which there really isn't ... then adding WAL support
> still leaves you with no real-world scenario for using it.
>
> This is not to suggest t
"John Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can someone clarify if WAL-logging of hash indexes will be supported
> in the 8.4 release?
There is absolutely 0 value in tackling that until someone can fix
hash's performance problems. If there is no real-world scenario for
using it ... which there rea
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-10/msg01468.php,
"... I very much want to encourage authors of new Resource Managers and it
looks like we may be getting at least 3 new RMs that produce WAL
records: hash indexes (currently not WAL-logged), bitmap indexes and
clustered indexes for
