Re: [HACKERS] VALID UNTIL

2012-03-21 Thread Tom Lane
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fabr=EDzio_de_Royes_Mello?= writes: > 2012/3/14 Tom Lane >> For most people it won't >> matter, but for people who are using the feature, it seems like >> important information. Per the OP's complaint, it's particularly >> important for those who have forgotten they're using the f

Re: [HACKERS] VALID UNTIL

2012-03-14 Thread Fabrízio de Royes Mello
2012/3/14 Tom Lane > > Why would you confine it to verbose mode? Because I did not want to change the current behavior of this psql command... but... For most people it won't > matter, but for people who are using the feature, it seems like > important information. Per the OP's complaint, it

Re: [HACKERS] VALID UNTIL

2012-03-14 Thread Tom Lane
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fabr=EDzio_de_Royes_Mello?= writes: > The attached patch put VALID UNTIL into attributes column in verbose mode > like example above. Why would you confine it to verbose mode? For most people it won't matter, but for people who are using the feature, it seems like important inform

Re: [HACKERS] VALID UNTIL

2012-03-14 Thread Fabrízio de Royes Mello
2012/3/14 David Fetter > > I don't know how frequently people use VALID UNTIL, but I'm guessing > it's not terribly often because yours is the first comment about how > it's not exposed, so I'd tend toward putting it in attributes rather > than a separate column. > > The attached patch put VALID

Re: [HACKERS] VALID UNTIL

2012-03-14 Thread Fabrízio de Royes Mello
2012/3/14 David Fetter > > I don't know how frequently people use VALID UNTIL, but I'm guessing > it's not terribly often because yours is the first comment about how > it's not exposed, so I'd tend toward putting it in attributes rather > than a separate column. > > If it's desired I can write a

Re: [HACKERS] VALID UNTIL

2012-03-14 Thread David Fetter
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:20:05AM -0300, Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote: > Hi, > > I have a hard time figuring out why my replication stopped with a message like > > FATAL: password authentication failed for user "foo" > > in the logs. I thought it was some pg_hba.conf change, a pgpass modifi

[HACKERS] VALID UNTIL

2012-03-14 Thread Euler Taveira
Hi, I have a hard time figuring out why my replication stopped with a message like FATAL: password authentication failed for user "foo" in the logs. I thought it was some pg_hba.conf change, a pgpass modification, or NOLOGIN option, it wasn't. I was out of options when I remembered to check if