Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Monday 21 May 2001 07:46, Arsalan Zaidi wrote:
> > We tried the RPM under RH 6.2 and it would unpack, saying we needed this or
> > that or the other... A whole bunch of dependencies.
>
> > I just want to be sure... there's no compelling reason to use R
Hi.
We tried the RPM under RH 6.2 and it would unpack, saying we needed this or
that or the other... A whole bunch of dependencies.
Anyway, once of us downloaded the source and compiled it and it worked...
I just want to be sure... there's no compelling reason to use RH 7.x
(basically any new d
