AW: AW: [HACKERS] User functions and AIX

2001-05-29 Thread Zeugswetter Andreas SB
> > > IBM is trying to find the answer to this but I thought I would throw ... > > > Tell me your link line, OS and compiler version. > > And have you forgotten to include -bI:postgres.imp ? > > Bingo! I can't believe that IBM has been wrestling with this for a week. > Part of the reason we a

AW: [HACKERS] User functions and AIX

2001-05-29 Thread Zeugswetter Andreas SB
> IBM is trying to find the answer to this but I thought I would throw > this out here to see if anyone can help me. I am compiling a user > defined type on AIX and it fails when I try to use it. The type is > chkpass and it is in the contrib directory. It fails with a core dump > at line 88 i

Re: [HACKERS] User functions and AIX

2001-05-28 Thread Tom Lane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D'Arcy J.M. Cain) writes: > I'm also not sure why these functions are involved > in reading the chkpass type. Precisely my point: they're not. That backtrace is false data. > Hmm. I just rebooted and reran the test (SELECT 'hello'::chkpass) and > it gave me a different stack

Re: [HACKERS] User functions and AIX

2001-05-28 Thread Tom Lane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D'Arcy J.M. Cain) writes: > The top of the backtrace looks like this. > #0 0x0 in ?? () from (unknown load module) > #1 0xd1087a60 in chkpass_in (fcinfo=0x0) at chkpass.c:88 > #2 0x10045cf4 in or_clause (clause=0x0) at clauses.c:211 > #3 0x10075d68 in int82ge (fcinfo=0x1015