Tom Lane wrote:
> "Robert Haas" writes:
>> I haven't looked at the patches, but one thing I'm concerned about is
>> the fact that it seems we still don't have a working implementation of
>> non-SEPostgresql column-level privileges. Apparently, the latest
>> patch set from Stephen Frost doesn't ha
"Robert Haas" writes:
> I haven't looked at the patches, but one thing I'm concerned about is
> the fact that it seems we still don't have a working implementation of
> non-SEPostgresql column-level privileges. Apparently, the latest
> patch set from Stephen Frost doesn't handle those permissions
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 4:44 AM, KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> > BTW, what is the currect status of my patches?
> > I guess you have many comments in the five patches, because they are a bit
> > large to be commited obviously.
> > Could you tell me, even if these are not comprehensive
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 4:44 AM, KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> BTW, what is the currect status of my patches?
> I guess you have many comments in the five patches, because they are a bit
> large to be commited obviously.
> Could you tell me, even if these are not comprehensive ones.
I haven't looked at th
I updates patch set of SE-PostgreSQL and related stuff (r1386).
[1/5]
http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql-sepgsql-8.4devel-3-r1386.patch
[2/5]
http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql-utils-8.4devel-3-r1386.patch
[3/5]
http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql-policy
