On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 6:49 PM, David E. Wheeler
wrote:
> On Aug 6, 2010, at 3:38 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>>> We definitely need to document the `text % text` constructor
>>
>> BTW, there isn't any % constructor anymore --- we agreed to provide
>> only the hstore(text, text) constructor.
>
> Oh, I m
On Aug 6, 2010, at 3:38 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> We definitely need to document the `text % text` constructor
>
> BTW, there isn't any % constructor anymore --- we agreed to provide
> only the hstore(text, text) constructor.
Oh, I must've been looking at an older checkout, then. Never mind.
Best,
"David E. Wheeler" writes:
> We definitely need to document the `text % text` constructor
BTW, there isn't any % constructor anymore --- we agreed to provide
only the hstore(text, text) constructor.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers
"David E. Wheeler" writes:
> On Aug 6, 2010, at 3:16 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It looks to me like you are changing the examples of the I/O
>> representation ... which did NOT change.
> Hrm? The first few examples at the top? I find them confusing because there
> are no single quotes around them, s
On Aug 6, 2010, at 3:16 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I noticed that the hstore docs still document the => operator instead
>> of %. This patch changes that.
>
> It looks to me like you are changing the examples of the I/O
> representation ... which did NOT change.
Hrm? The first few examples at the to
"David E. Wheeler" writes:
> I noticed that the hstore docs still document the => operator instead
> of %. This patch changes that.
It looks to me like you are changing the examples of the I/O
representation ... which did NOT change.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-
Hackers,
I noticed that the hstore docs still document the => operator instead of %.
This patch changes that. It also updates the first examples to us full SQL
statements, because otherwise the use of => without surrounding single quotes
was confusing.
Best,
David
hstoredoc.patch
Descripti
