Andrew Chernow wrote:
> > going. Also, there is much threading API churn that we haven't been fond
> > of trying to get everything working.
> >
>
> The provided pthreads is 100% busted on unixware. I'd only recommend its use
> to
> someone I don't like :) This is one of several platforms that
going. Also, there is much threading API churn that we haven't been fond
of trying to get everything working.
The provided pthreads is 100% busted on unixware. I'd only recommend its use to
someone I don't like :) This is one of several platforms that we use the GNU
Pth library as a replace
Andrew Chernow wrote:
>
> > I am afraid this falls in the same category as the HP-UX patch, in that
> > it is for threading on an older platform
>
> Really? It was released in 2004 (maintenance pack 4 released in June 2008).
Oh, I didn't know that. We have had lots of problems with SCO/Unixwa
I am afraid this falls in the same category as the HP-UX patch, in that
it is for threading on an older platform
Really? It was released in 2004 (maintenance pack 4 released in June 2008).
It would be interesting if you could host a web page, perhaps on our
wiki, that lists patches for old
I don't think anyone replied to your questions below so let me try.
I am afraid this falls in the same category as the HP-UX patch, in that
it is for threading on an older platform and is more for a single site
rather than something where more users can benefit.
It would be interesting if you co
Continuing http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-01/msg01762.php
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Well, this helps explain why were are getting these problems reports
> only now. How many hacks do you have that we don't support, aside from
> the threading one for HPUX?
>
Compiling threaded
