Re: [HACKERS] UnixWare 7.1.1b FS

2000-10-23 Thread Larry Rosenman
OK, removing the second --with-CXX got us past configure, and gmake ran a long while, but MAXBUFSIZE didn't get defined such that fe-connect.c died: gmake -C doc all gmake[1]: Entering directory `/home/ler/pg-dev/pgsql-snap/doc' gmake[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[1]: Leaving directory

AW: [HACKERS] UnixWare 7.1.1b FS

2000-10-23 Thread Zeugswetter Andreas SB
> And the --with-CXX option is honored, but only if you don't > override it in the template file. :) Is this the precedence we want ? I would have thought that commandline is preferred over template. Andreas

Re: [HACKERS] UnixWare 7.1.1b FS

2000-10-21 Thread Larry Rosenman
* Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001021 12:04]: > * Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001021 11:45]: > > > 2) I forced CC=cc and CXX=CC in src/templates/unixware and removed the > > > -K i486 option, and we still pass GCC options. This is *NOT* good... > > > > Don't do that then. Setti

Re: [HACKERS] UnixWare 7.1.1b FS

2000-10-21 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Larry Rosenman writes: > OK, then please allow --with-CC and --with-CXX. I tried it, and it > didn't honor the --with-CXX option. Please also document same in > ./configure --help. The C compiler is chosen with the CC environment variable. That is documented. The C++ compiler can be chosen

Re: [HACKERS] UnixWare 7.1.1b FS

2000-10-21 Thread Larry Rosenman
* Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001021 12:02]: > I wrote: > > > Larry Rosenman writes: > > > > > 1) when I included -with-openssl, it didn't add /usr/local/ssl/lib to > > > the -L options, so couldn't find libssl.a > > > > Confirmed. It's being put into a different variable. I'll see

Re: [HACKERS] UnixWare 7.1.1b FS

2000-10-21 Thread Bruce Momjian
DOne. > * Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001021 11:45]: > > Larry Rosenman writes: > > > > > 1) when I included -with-openssl, it didn't add /usr/local/ssl/lib to > > > the -L options, so couldn't find libssl.a > > > > Confirmed. It's being put into a different variable. I'll see about

Re: [HACKERS] UnixWare 7.1.1b FS

2000-10-21 Thread Larry Rosenman
* Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001021 11:45]: > Larry Rosenman writes: > > > 1) when I included -with-openssl, it didn't add /usr/local/ssl/lib to > > the -L options, so couldn't find libssl.a > > Confirmed. It's being put into a different variable. I'll see about > fixing this. Cool.

Re: [HACKERS] UnixWare 7.1.1b FS

2000-10-21 Thread Peter Eisentraut
I wrote: > Larry Rosenman writes: > > > 1) when I included -with-openssl, it didn't add /usr/local/ssl/lib to > > the -L options, so couldn't find libssl.a > > Confirmed. It's being put into a different variable. I'll see about > fixing this. No, this is fine. It's in the LIBS variable, whe

Re: [HACKERS] UnixWare 7.1.1b FS

2000-10-21 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Larry Rosenman writes: > 1) when I included -with-openssl, it didn't add /usr/local/ssl/lib to > the -L options, so couldn't find libssl.a Confirmed. It's being put into a different variable. I'll see about fixing this. > 2) I forced CC=cc and CXX=CC in src/templates/unixware and removed the

Re: [HACKERS] UnixWare 7.1.1b FS

2000-10-21 Thread Larry Rosenman
* Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001021 07:34]: > I will, in the next couple of days... Well, I pulled todays (2000/10/21) snapshot. I didn't get very far... 1) when I included -with-openssl, it didn't add /usr/local/ssl/lib to the -L options, so couldn't find libssl.a 2) I forced CC=cc

Re: [HACKERS] UnixWare 7.1.1b FS

2000-10-21 Thread Larry Rosenman
* Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001021 03:42]: > Larry Rosenman writes: > > > Question: Why do we (for UnixWare) force i486 optimization? > > No particularly good reason, I suppose. We could remove it and leave it > up to the installer to choose the optimization level. > > > CXXFLAGS=

Re: [HACKERS] UnixWare 7.1.1b FS

2000-10-21 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Larry Rosenman writes: > Question: Why do we (for UnixWare) force i486 optimization? No particularly good reason, I suppose. We could remove it and leave it up to the installer to choose the optimization level. > CXXFLAGS=-O ./configure --with-perl --with-CC=cc --with-CXX=CC >--with-includes

[HACKERS] UnixWare 7.1.1b FS

2000-10-20 Thread Larry Rosenman
I got early access to the UnixWare 7.1.1b Feature Supplement UnixWare/OpenServer Development Kit (UDK FS for short). PostgreSQL 7.0.2 compiles CLEAN (ish...) and we can now support the C++ stuff. The 3.2 bug in int8.c is GONE. Question: Why do we (for UnixWare) force i486 optimization? A