On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, jtv wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 11:20:47PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > > Has the author been given CVS access yet?
> >
> > Yes, he has. I got him in touch with Marc. I was just pointing out
> > that while he knows C++, he needs help getting the connecting stu
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 11:20:47PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > Has the author been given CVS access yet?
>
> Yes, he has. I got him in touch with Marc. I was just pointing out
> that while he knows C++, he needs help getting the connecting stuff
> merged to our coding style.
Haven't h
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 12:18:16AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> There seems to have been an accumulation lately of stuff that was simply
> dumped into the source tree without any sort of integration. I am
> particularly talking about interfaces/ssl and interfaces/libpqxx. No
> doubt both of
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > > There seems to have been an accumulation lately of stuff that was simply
> > > dumped into the source tree without any sort of integration. I am
> > > particularly talking about interfaces/ssl and interfaces/libpqxx. No
> > > doubt both of these things are us
Neil Conway wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 11:06:10PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > Personally, I'm uneasy about carrying around another interface library
> > > that appears to have no basis in any sort of standard.
>
> Erm, upon which standards are the other lan
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 11:06:10PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Personally, I'm uneasy about carrying around another interface library
> > that appears to have no basis in any sort of standard.
Erm, upon which standards are the other language interfaces based?
> The
> > There seems to have been an accumulation lately of stuff that was simply
> > dumped into the source tree without any sort of integration. I am
> > particularly talking about interfaces/ssl and interfaces/libpqxx. No
> > doubt both of these things are useful in the end, but as they are right
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> There seems to have been an accumulation lately of stuff that was simply
> dumped into the source tree without any sort of integration. I am
> particularly talking about interfaces/ssl and interfaces/libpqxx. No
> doubt both of these things are useful in the end, but as
There seems to have been an accumulation lately of stuff that was simply
dumped into the source tree without any sort of integration. I am
particularly talking about interfaces/ssl and interfaces/libpqxx. No
doubt both of these things are useful in the end, but as they are right
now they're a he
