Re: [HACKERS] Ultrix port

2001-03-29 Thread Alexander Klimov
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > Alexander Klimov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > First problem is sys/socket.h. Here it has no guards in it (like > > #ifdef _SOCKET_H > > #endif), so it could not be included twice, and I have to remove its > > unnecesarry inclusions. > > Are you sure the

Re: [HACKERS] Ultrix port

2001-03-27 Thread Tom Lane
Alexander Klimov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > First problem is sys/socket.h. Here it has no guards in it (like > #ifdef _SOCKET_H > #endif), so it could not be included twice, and I have to remove its > unnecesarry inclusions. Are you sure these are unnecessary? What are the odds this patch wi

Re: [HACKERS] Ultrix port

2001-03-27 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Alexander Klimov writes: > After two days of strugle I have compiled pgsql on ultrix, patch is in > attachment. I still can't run `gmake check', because of shell problems > in install.log: > > install: no destination specified > gmake[6]: *** [install-lib-shared] Error 1 > gmake[6]: Leaving

[HACKERS] Ultrix port

2001-03-27 Thread Alexander Klimov
Hi all. After two days of strugle I have compiled pgsql on ultrix, patch is in attachment. I still can't run `gmake check', because of shell problems in install.log: install:no destination specified gmake[6]: *** [install-lib-shared] Error 1 gmake[6]: Leaving directory `/tmp_mnt/hosts/wi