On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Cédric Villemain
wrote:
> The fact that you didn''t saw it might be enough to reconsider the way
> we display the unlogged state (and temp state) of a relation.
>
> Maybe some a "Durability: normal, temp, unlogged" line at bottom of
> the \d output ?
The term we
2011/2/22 Itagaki Takahiro :
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 18:11, Cédric Villemain
> wrote:
>> 2011/2/22 Itagaki Takahiro :
>>> psql \d(+) doesn't show any information about UNLOGGED and TEMP attributes
>>> for the table. So, we cannot know the table is unlogged or not unless
>>> we directly select fr
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 18:11, Cédric Villemain
wrote:
> 2011/2/22 Itagaki Takahiro :
>> psql \d(+) doesn't show any information about UNLOGGED and TEMP attributes
>> for the table. So, we cannot know the table is unlogged or not unless
>> we directly select from pg_class.relpersistence. Is this
2011/2/22 Itagaki Takahiro :
> psql \d(+) doesn't show any information about UNLOGGED and TEMP attributes
> for the table. So, we cannot know the table is unlogged or not unless
> we directly select from pg_class.relpersistence. Is this a TODO item?
>
> The same issue is in TEMP tables, but we can
psql \d(+) doesn't show any information about UNLOGGED and TEMP attributes
for the table. So, we cannot know the table is unlogged or not unless
we directly select from pg_class.relpersistence. Is this a TODO item?
The same issue is in TEMP tables, but we can determine them by their
schema; they
