Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Not that I've heard of. It's very hard to muster any enthusiasm for
> >> improving hash indexes unless their lack of WAL-logging is fixed first.
>
> > This is really strange though. Surely adding WAL-logging is not an
> > enorm
On 02/04/2016 11:34 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera writes:
This is really strange though. Surely adding WAL-logging is not an
enormous task anymore ... I mean, we're undertaking far larger efforts
now, the WAL logging code is simpler than before, and we even have a
tool (ok, gotta streamli
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Not that I've heard of. It's very hard to muster any enthusiasm for
>> improving hash indexes unless their lack of WAL-logging is fixed first.
> This is really strange though. Surely adding WAL-logging is not an
> enormous task anymore ... I mean, we'
Tom Lane wrote:
> Shubham Barai writes:
> > I wanted to know if anyone is working on these projects from todo list.
> > 1.Add UNIQUE capability to hash indexes
> > 2.Allow multi-column hash indexes
>
> Not that I've heard of. It's very hard to muster any enthusiasm for
> improving hash indexes u
On 2/4/16 1:12 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Shubham Barai writes:
>> I wanted to know if anyone is working on these projects from todo list.
>> 1.Add UNIQUE capability to hash indexes
>> 2.Allow multi-column hash indexes
>
> Not that I've heard of. It's very hard to muster any enthusiasm for
> improvin
Shubham Barai writes:
> I wanted to know if anyone is working on these projects from todo list.
> 1.Add UNIQUE capability to hash indexes
> 2.Allow multi-column hash indexes
Not that I've heard of. It's very hard to muster any enthusiasm for
improving hash indexes unless their lack of WAL-loggin
Hello hackers ,
I wanted to know if anyone is working on these projects from todo list.
1.Add UNIQUE capability to hash indexes
2.Allow multi-column hash indexes
I couldn't find any discussion about these projects.
Thanks,
Shubham Barai
