On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 02:14:12PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> That's ecpg, not "C interface" --- the latter term is unlikely to
> draw the attention of the right person, namely Michael.
Right, thanks Tom. I have an email filter that filters all emails containing
"ecpg" anf puts them into a special d
Josh Berkus writes:
> Can someone verify that these two C interface issues are intentional?
> If not, they're bugs:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-testers/2010-05/msg00011.php
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-testers/2010-05/msg00010.php
That's ecpg, not "C interface" --- the latter
All,
BTW, it would be good if some other folks than me were monitoring -testers.
Can someone verify that these two C interface issues are intentional?
If not, they're bugs:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-testers/2010-05/msg00011.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-testers/2010-05/msg0
