Re: [HACKERS] The improvement for psql of 8.2beta1 not

On 10/8/06, Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The test shows that it's OK under Linux (Slackware), but > >> malfunctioned on Windows XP. > > > > Good point. We don't use readline on Win32, but rather the native > > command-line control, over which we have little control. > > Does

Re: [HACKERS] The improvement for psql of 8.2beta1 not

> >> The test shows that it's OK under Linux (Slackware), but > >> malfunctioned on Windows XP. > > > > Good point. We don't use readline on Win32, but rather the native > > command-line control, over which we have little control. > > Does libedit compile under mingw? No. At least, it didn't

Re: [HACKERS] The improvement for psql of 8.2beta1 not

Bruce Momjian wrote: > Yourfriend wrote: >> According to the release notes of 8.2, the following item should have been >> implemented, >> >> E.1.3.11. >> psqlChanges >> >>- >> >>Save multi-line statements as a single entry, ra

Re: [HACKERS] The improvement for psql of 8.2beta1 not

Yourfriend wrote: > According to the release notes of 8.2, the following item should have been > implemented, > > E.1.3.11. > psqlChanges > >- > >Save multi-line statements as a single entry, rather than one line at >a

[HACKERS] The improvement for psql of 8.2beta1 not implemented under Windows

According to the release notes of 8.2, the following item should have been implemented, E.1.3.11. psql ChangesSave multi-line statements as a single entry, rather than one line at a time (Sergey E. Koposov) This makes up-arrow recall of queries easier. The