Jim Nasby wrote:
>Rather than trying to wedge this into a heap page, ISTM it'd be
>better to use a fork. Presumably if you're storing regular tuples
>that have the essential data from pg_class, pg_attribute (and maybe
>pg_type).
Well, three things:
- The information preferably is present in the sa
On 2/3/15 1:43 AM, Stephen R. van den Berg wrote:
In relation to the talk and discussions at FOSDEM regarding
helping data recovery, I searched the archives for the
old thread after I performed my last recovery; for reference:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20101019201223.ga15...@cuci.nl
In relation to the talk and discussions at FOSDEM regarding
helping data recovery, I searched the archives for the
old thread after I performed my last recovery; for reference:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20101019201223.ga15...@cuci.nl
I haven't checked yet if the proposed space there is
