> At 11:18 04/02/01 +0200, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> >Peter Mount wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > > It's been a while since I delved into the backend, but unless it's changed
> > > from fork() to threading,
> >
> >Someone posted here recently his port/tweaks of backend so that it used
> >threads instead of
At 12:36 03/02/01 -0500, Alex Pilosov wrote:
>On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, Peter Mount wrote:
[snip]
> > I know some people think this would slow the backend down, but it's
> > only the instanciation of the JVM thats slow, hence the other reason
> > fork() is holding this back. Ideally you would want th
At 17:56 03/02/01 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>Peter Mount writes:
>
> > Thats correct. Basically you are talking of something like PL/Java. The
> > Java side would be simple, but its linking the JVM to the backend that's
> > the problem.
>
>I've tried that recently, here's how it looks as far
At 11:18 04/02/01 +0200, Hannu Krosing wrote:
>Peter Mount wrote:
[snip]
> > It's been a while since I delved into the backend, but unless it's changed
> > from fork() to threading,
>
>Someone posted here recently his port/tweaks of backend so that it used
>threads instead of fork(). IIRC it was
Peter Mount wrote:
>
> At 14:57 02/02/01 -0500, Alex Pilosov wrote:
> >On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, tomasz konefal wrote:
> >
> > > could someone please clarify what "Allow Java
> > > server-side programming" actually means? what are the
> > > limitations of using java and jdbc with pgsql?
> >
> >It me
On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, Peter Mount wrote:
> It's been a while since I delved into the backend, but unless it's
> changed from fork() to threading, I don't really see this happening,
> unless someone who knows C that well knows of a portable way of
> communicating between two processes - other than R
Peter Mount writes:
> Thats correct. Basically you are talking of something like PL/Java. The
> Java side would be simple, but its linking the JVM to the backend that's
> the problem.
I've tried that recently, here's how it looks as far as Linux JVMs go:
* Kaffe has a very polluted name space.
At 14:57 02/02/01 -0500, Alex Pilosov wrote:
>On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, tomasz konefal wrote:
>
> > could someone please clarify what "Allow Java
> > server-side programming" actually means? what are the
> > limitations of using java and jdbc with pgsql?
>
>It means to embed Java interpreter inside p
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, tomasz konefal wrote:
> could someone please clarify what "Allow Java
> server-side programming" actually means? what are the
> limitations of using java and jdbc with pgsql?
It means to embed Java interpreter inside postgres, and allow writing
stored procedures and trigge
greetings, group! :)
i have a question about the TODO list and could not
find an answer in any of the list archives. i am very
new to SQL and even newer to pgsql, so my ideas of how
things work is still a bit fuzzy. i am currently
working on a small e-commerce type website which is
hopefully
10 matches
Mail list logo
