Josh Berkus writes:
> "Performs best" is pretty elusive. On Solaris 10, for example, fdatasync
> does best on pgbench on x86, but opendatasync does best on DBT2 on Sparc.
> I'm not certain we can really determine this with any accuracy.
Yeah, if it were easy we've have done it already :-(.
Tom, JD,
> No, that only tells you if the various alternatives *work*. Not which
> one performs best.
"Performs best" is pretty elusive. On Solaris 10, for example, fdatasync
does best on pgbench on x86, but opendatasync does best on DBT2 on Sparc.
I'm not certain we can really determine th
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Doesn't this exist in:
> src/tools/fsync?
No, that only tells you if the various alternatives *work*. Not which
one performs best.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
T
Doesn't this exist in:
src/tools/fsync?
Do we just need to make it more user friendly?
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 19
