On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:29:44 +, "Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a big reason why TOAST tables are called such cryptic names?
>
> e.g. pg_toast.pg_toast_16399
>
> Wouldn't it be more pleasant to have them called the same thing as their
> parent
>
> e.g. pg_toast._toast
>
W
Is there a big reason why TOAST tables are called such cryptic names?
e.g. pg_toast.pg_toast_16399
Wouldn't it be more pleasant to have them called the same thing as their
parent
e.g. pg_toast._toast
This would be very convenient for most purposes, though it would mean
we'd have to do something
