On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 2:44 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> This subthread is getting absurd, stopping here.
Yeah, I agree with Andres here, we are making a mountain of nothing
(Frenglish?). I'll send to the other thread some additional ideas soon
using a JSON structure.
--
Michael
--
Sent via pgsq
On 2015-07-03 10:27:05 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 07/03/2015 03:12 AM, Sawada Masahiko wrote:
> > Thanks. So we can choice the next master server using by checking the
> > progress of each server, if hot standby is enabled.
> > And a such procedure is needed even today replication.
> >
> > I t
On 07/03/2015 03:12 AM, Sawada Masahiko wrote:
> Thanks. So we can choice the next master server using by checking the
> progress of each server, if hot standby is enabled.
> And a such procedure is needed even today replication.
>
> I think that the #2 problem which is Josh pointed out seems to b
On 2015-07-02 14:54:19 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 07/02/2015 12:44 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2015-07-02 11:50:44 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> So there's two parts to this:
> >>
> >> 1. I need to ensure that data is replicated to X places.
> >>
> >> 2. I need to *know* which places data
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Sawada Masahiko wrote:
>> Yeah, quorum commit is helpful for minimizing data loss in comparison
>> with today replication.
>> But in this your case, how can we know which server we should use as
>> the next maste
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Sawada Masahiko wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>> On 07/02/2015 12:44 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2015-07-02 11:50:44 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> So there's two parts to
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> On 07/02/2015 12:44 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>>> On 2015-07-02 11:50:44 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
So there's two parts to this:
1. I need to ensure that data is replicated to
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 07/02/2015 12:44 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> On 2015-07-02 11:50:44 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>> So there's two parts to this:
>>>
>>> 1. I need to ensure that data is replicated to X places.
>>>
>>> 2. I need to *know* which places data was
On 07/02/2015 12:44 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2015-07-02 11:50:44 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> So there's two parts to this:
>>
>> 1. I need to ensure that data is replicated to X places.
>>
>> 2. I need to *know* which places data was synchronously replicated to
>> when the master goes down.
>
