* Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001021 13:25]:
> Larry Rosenman writes:
>
> > I was just thinking of checking uname -v and if it is 7.1.0 or 7.1.1
> > set a define that pq_comm.c sees and includes the fix. There isn't a
> > good #define yet.. :-(
>
> We could use the result of
>
> che
Larry Rosenman writes:
> I was just thinking of checking uname -v and if it is 7.1.0 or 7.1.1
> set a define that pq_comm.c sees and includes the fix. There isn't a
> good #define yet.. :-(
We could use the result of
checking host system type... i586-sco-sysv5uw7.1.1
But which one is the goo
* Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001021 11:54]:
> Larry Rosenman writes:
>
> > We currently have a patch in the doc/FAQ_SCO file for the "accept
> > doesn't send AF_UNIX to the caller" problem on SCO UnixWare 7.1.[01].
> > Is there any problem with configure finding out we are on one of t
Larry Rosenman writes:
> We currently have a patch in the doc/FAQ_SCO file for the "accept
> doesn't send AF_UNIX to the caller" problem on SCO UnixWare 7.1.[01].
> Is there any problem with configure finding out we are on one of those
> releases (uname -v), and setting a UW= variable so the use
We currently have a patch in the doc/FAQ_SCO file for the "accept
doesn't send AF_UNIX to the caller" problem on SCO UnixWare 7.1.[01].
Is there any problem with configure finding out we are on one of those
releases (uname -v), and setting a UW= variable so the user doesn't
have to remember to pa
