Apologies! As Alvaro guessed it correctly I was working with 8.2 sources.
Sorry for the noise.
Regards,
Nikhils
On 8/29/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> NikhilS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The attached patch should fix this.
>
> And break other things, no doubt. needed = 0 is a pe
NikhilS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The attached patch should fix this.
And break other things, no doubt. needed = 0 is a perfectly valid
edge case and mustn't be rejected here. (In fact, I doubt you'd
even get through the regression tests with this patch ... how much
did you test it?)
The re
Andrew Dunstan escribió:
>
>
> NikhilS wrote:
>>
>>
>> I also found the absence of a function like resetStringInfo() a bit
>> puzzling. A found a lot of places where the code was resetting the "len"
>> field to 0 and assigning '\0' to the data field to reset the variable.
>> This seems to be the
NikhilS wrote:
I also found the absence of a function like resetStringInfo() a bit
puzzling. A found a lot of places where the code was resetting the
"len" field to 0 and assigning '\0' to the data field to reset the
variable. This seems to be the only missing API which will be needed
whi
Hi,
I palloc0'ed a variable of type StringInfo and without doing an
initStringInfo() (forgot to do it i.e.) tried to append some stuff to it
using appendStringInfo(). It went into a tight loop within the function
enlargeStringInfo() at:
while (needed > newlen)
Must be a common enough case for a
