On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 12 February 2015 at 13:56, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Thom Brown wrote:
>> > Today I witnessed a situation which appears to have gone down like this:
>> >
>> > - The primary server starting streaming WAL data
On 12 February 2015 at 13:56, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Thom Brown wrote:
> > Today I witnessed a situation which appears to have gone down like this:
> >
> > - The primary server starting streaming WAL data from segment 00A8 to the
> > standby
> > - The standby serv
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Thom Brown wrote:
> Today I witnessed a situation which appears to have gone down like this:
>
> - The primary server starting streaming WAL data from segment 00A8 to the
> standby
> - The standby server started receiving that data
> - Before 00A8 is finished, the
Hi,
Today I witnessed a situation which appears to have gone down like this:
- The primary server starting streaming WAL data from segment 00A8 to the
standby
- The standby server started receiving that data
- Before 00A8 is finished, the wal sender process dies on the primary, but
the archiver p
