Re: [HACKERS] Something's not (de)compressing right

2003-12-09 Thread Elliot Lee
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Tom Lane wrote: > Elliot Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2000-07/msg00483.php > > I'm having this same problem with postgresql 7.3.4. > > You aren't having the "same" problem, because that UNION bug was fixed > ages ago. You're

Re: [HACKERS] Something's not (de)compressing right

2003-12-08 Thread Tom Lane
Elliot Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2000-07/msg00483.php > I'm having this same problem with postgresql 7.3.4. You aren't having the "same" problem, because that UNION bug was fixed ages ago. > Easy to reproduce by running an 'INSERT' query. Let'

Re: [HACKERS] Something's not (de)compressing right

2003-12-05 Thread Elliot Lee
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2000-07/msg00483.php I'm having this same problem with postgresql 7.3.4. Easy to reproduce by running an 'INSERT' query. Here is some of the debugging info if I break near the beginning of the pglz_decompress function: (gdb) p dend $1 = (unsigned cha