Re: [HACKERS] Some questions about the NetWare Port - please comment

2002-11-01 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > "Ulrich Neumann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > - 3 of the 8 mentioned sourcefiles are files that are heavily changed > > for NetWare and I don't want to change the original files in this > > case. I think it's better to have a copy of these files in the NetWare > > folder. This

Antw: Re: [HACKERS] Some questions about the NetWare Port -please comment

2002-11-01 Thread Ulrich Neumann
Tom, I undestand that you think that it might be a nightmare. The idea behind this idea is that NetWare doesn't use fork() to create a process, it uses procle() or procve(). That's very similar to NT's createProcess() or the combination of fork/exec. Additional i've implemented a way that is base

Re: [HACKERS] Some questions about the NetWare Port - please comment

2002-11-01 Thread Tom Lane
"Ulrich Neumann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > - 3 of the 8 mentioned sourcefiles are files that are heavily changed > for NetWare and I don't want to change the original files in this > case. I think it's better to have a copy of these files in the NetWare > folder. This gives me the chance to use

[HACKERS] Some questions about the NetWare Port - please comment

2002-11-01 Thread Ulrich Neumann
Hello together, after some discussions with you and other people I want to add all changes and additions that i've done with PostgreSQL back to you. In order to do this I thought of the following way: (If someone can comment on these ideas this would be great.) - I've created a folder pgsql/src/N