Re: [HACKERS] Small 9.1 documentation fix (SSPI auth)

2011-06-27 Thread Christian Ullrich
* Robert Haas wrote: On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Christian Ullrich wrote: When Magnus fixed and applied my SSPI-via-GSS patch in January, we forgot to fix to the documentation. Suggested patch attached; should I also put that four-liner into any CFs? I have committed a slightly differe

Re: [HACKERS] Small 9.1 documentation fix (SSPI auth)

2011-06-27 Thread Robert Haas
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Christian Ullrich wrote: > When Magnus fixed and applied my SSPI-via-GSS patch in January, we forgot to > fix to the documentation. Suggested patch attached; should I also put that > four-liner into any CFs? I have committed a slightly different wording change to

[HACKERS] Small 9.1 documentation fix (SSPI auth)

2011-06-24 Thread Christian Ullrich
When Magnus fixed and applied my SSPI-via-GSS patch in January, we forgot to fix to the documentation. Suggested patch attached; should I also put that four-liner into any CFs? -- Christian diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/client-auth.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/client-auth.sgml new file mode 100644 index 575