Christopher Browne wrote:
Further bonus: the "GUI project" need only have a database connection
to one of the databases to control things. No need for ANYTHING else.
After fleshing it out a little, that's a pretty slick approach.
You miss the point, sorry.
This "make GUI easy to write" approach
In the last exciting episode, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jochem van Dieten) wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> I personally don't think that a GUI tool should be the province of
>> the Slony project. Seriously. I think that Slony should focus on
>> a command-line api and catalogs, and allow the existing GUI
Jan Wieck wrote:
Alex J. Avriette wrote:
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 12:47:23AM +0100, Jochem van Dieten wrote:
>I personally don't think that a GUI tool should be the province of
the >Slony project. Seriously. I think that Slony should focus on a
I very much agree with this, but this is Jan'
Jochem van Dieten wrote:
Jan Wieck said:
The communication channels are "event" tables. The node daemons
use listen and notify to send messages from on to another.
Messages are only exchanged over this when the replication cluster
configuration is changed or every 10 seconds to tell "new
replicat
Jan Wieck said:
>
> The communication channels are "event" tables. The node daemons
> use listen and notify to send messages from on to another.
> Messages are only exchanged over this when the replication cluster
> configuration is changed or every 10 seconds to tell "new
> replication data has
Alex J. Avriette wrote:
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 12:47:23AM +0100, Jochem van Dieten wrote:
>I personally don't think that a GUI tool should be the province of the
>Slony project. Seriously. I think that Slony should focus on a
I very much agree with this, but this is Jan's baby, so I didn't s
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 12:47:23AM +0100, Jochem van Dieten wrote:
> >I personally don't think that a GUI tool should be the province of the
> >Slony project. Seriously. I think that Slony should focus on a
I very much agree with this, but this is Jan's baby, so I didn't say
anything. I have
Josh Berkus wrote:
I personally don't think that a GUI tool should be the province of the Slony
project. Seriously. I think that Slony should focus on a command-line api
and catalogs, and allow the existing GUI projects to build a slony-supporting
interface.
Why a command line api? I believe
Jan,
> What I am looking for is a super-comfortable GUI application that makes
> planning and configuring a master-cascaded-multislave replication system
> doable by everyone who can identify a clickable button.
I personally don't think that a GUI tool should be the province of the Slony
project
Followup-To: Slony1-general ML
Alex J. Avriette wrote:
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 04:57:28PM -0500, Jan Wieck wrote:
After some substantial progress on the Slony-I engine development, I'd
like to give a little status report and invite everyone who wants to
participate in this project to join the m
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 04:57:28PM -0500, Jan Wieck wrote:
> After some substantial progress on the Slony-I engine development, I'd
> like to give a little status report and invite everyone who wants to
> participate in this project to join the mailing list and the development
> team.
Jan, than
After some substantial progress on the Slony-I engine development, I'd
like to give a little status report and invite everyone who wants to
participate in this project to join the mailing list and the development
team.
The project homepage is here:
http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/slony
12 matches
Mail list logo
