On Wed, 9 May 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I'm talking about the minor number. The only thing that effects is
> that executables would pick up the new version if they have the old
> one in the path as well, no potential problems.
Okay, but, what does that buy you? One overwrites the old lib
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The Hermit Hacker writes:
>
> > IMHO, it should only be changed if there are incompatibilities between
> > releases ... we modify the API, mainly ... anything more then that, and
> > we're making ppl recompile to pull in libraries that only unlying
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > We did not bump the shared library versions before the 7.1 release.
> > Maybe we should do this before 7.1.2 goes out.
>
> I thought I did that long ago for 7.1, or I should have anyway. I don't
> see the commits either. Seems we can't do it in a min
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> We did not bump the shared library versions before the 7.1 release.
>> Maybe we should do this before 7.1.2 goes out.
> I thought I did that long ago for 7.1, or I should have anyway. I don't
> see the commits either. Seems we can't do it in a minor
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> We did not bump the shared library versions before the 7.1 release.
> Maybe we should do this before 7.1.2 goes out.
Ummm ... unless there are any changes that would require someone to
recompile their apps between v7.1.1 and v7.1.2, I don't think so
