Re: [HACKERS] Shared library conflicts

2006-06-23 Thread Thomas Hallgren
That's good news. Any chance of getting this fix backported to 8.1? Or at least, the libz part of it? Regards, Thomas Hallgren Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 10:45:29AM +0200, Thomas Hallgren wrote: There was a discussion some time back concerning the linking of the

Re: [HACKERS] Shared library conflicts

2006-06-23 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 10:45:29AM +0200, Thomas Hallgren wrote: > There was a discussion some time back concerning the linking of the > postgres backend. Some libraries where linked although they where not > needed, mainly because it was convenient. AIUI, this was fixed in -HEAD. In the Makefil

Re: [HACKERS] Shared library conflicts

2006-06-23 Thread William ZHANG
"Thomas Hallgren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Another related question. What happens when I use --without-zlib? Does it > have any effect on besides disabling compression for the dump/restore > utilities? Is there anyway to make it affect the backend only? --without-zlib will affected LIBS and HAVE

[HACKERS] Shared library conflicts

2006-06-23 Thread Thomas Hallgren
There was a discussion some time back concerning the linking of the postgres backend. Some libraries where linked although they where not needed, mainly because it was convenient. I had a problem with PL/Java since a Sun JVM ships with their own version of libz.so (they call it libzip.so). Sun