Does pl/python even have a DECLARE section that can mimick the data type
of an existing table column?
---
Greg Copeland wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> Does anyone know if such effort is also required to pl/python
Does anyone know if such effort is also required to pl/python to become
"schema aware"?
Regards,
Greg Copeland
On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 19:24, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Patch applied. Thanks.
>
> ---
>
>
> Joe Con
Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Joe Conway wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Sean Chittenden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >>::sigh:: Is it me or does it look like all
> >>of pl/pgsql is schema un-aware (ie, all of the declara
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches
I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
---
Joe Conway wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Sean C
Tom Lane wrote:
> Sean Chittenden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>::sigh:: Is it me or does it look like all
>>of pl/pgsql is schema un-aware (ie, all of the declarations). -sc
>
>
> Yeah. The group of routines parse_word, parse_dblword, etc that are
> called by the lexer certainly all need w
