Simon Riggs writes:
> On 11 May 2017 at 17:41, Tom Lane wrote:
>> ...because code that worked fine for Peter and me failed
>> erratically in the buildfarm.
> I think its always a little bit too exciting for me also.
> I suggest we have a commit tree and a main tree, with automatic
> copying fro
On 11 May 2017 at 17:41, Tom Lane wrote:
> ...because code that worked fine for Peter and me failed
> erratically in the buildfarm.
I think its always a little bit too exciting for me also.
I suggest we have a commit tree and a main tree, with automatic
copying from commit -> main either
1. 24 h
Monday's round of security patches was a lot more exciting than I would
have liked, because code that worked fine for Peter and me failed
erratically in the buildfarm. What eventually emerged was that I'd added
some missing free_attstatsslot() calls in rangetypes_selfuncs.c, and
naively copied the
