Re: [HACKERS] SSL BIO wrappers

2008-12-09 Thread Tom Lane
Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The logic in it is identical to the original import of code in OpenSSL. > It originally had #ifdefs around how the BIO interface worked. That was > tidied up in a commit back in 2001. I think it's fair to say it's been > pretty stable. Fair enough. >

Re: [HACKERS] SSL BIO wrappers

2008-12-09 Thread Magnus Hagander
Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Attached patch replaces the SSL BIO wrapper code we have now, with one >> that directly calls the send() and recv() functions instead. THis means >> that they get passed through the rewrite macros to our internal >> functions on Win32

Re: [HACKERS] SSL BIO wrappers

2008-12-09 Thread Tom Lane
Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Attached patch replaces the SSL BIO wrapper code we have now, with one > that directly calls the send() and recv() functions instead. THis means > that they get passed through the rewrite macros to our internal > functions on Win32, and I think this wil

[HACKERS] SSL BIO wrappers

2008-12-09 Thread Magnus Hagander
Attached patch replaces the SSL BIO wrapper code we have now, with one that directly calls the send() and recv() functions instead. THis means that they get passed through the rewrite macros to our internal functions on Win32, and I think this will fix some of the strange errors that seem to be pla