Christopher Kings-Lynne writes:
> Seems there's a few errors in the SQL99 compatibility list. For one, it
> says we support WITH CHECK OPTION on views which I'm pretty sure we don't.
I've gone through the list and made some corrections. It makes for a nice
to-do list now (with the possible exce
Hi,
Seems there's a few errors in the SQL99 compatibility list. For one, it
says we support WITH CHECK OPTION on views which I'm pretty sure we don't.
Also Referential MATCH types? We don't do partial I think. I think someone
might have to give the list a once-over...?
Chris
---
