Josh,
Actually that is a poorly worded page. It really should be something
like, "How to submit a patch" or "How to get your patch committed".
Yeah, I told Bruce I was going to re-write that page but seem to have
been short some Round Tuits.
--Josh
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
Hi, Pgsql-hackers.
> many seem (to me) to be overly tied to an "all XML all the time" view.
Only for hierarchical result sets. Even in case of
http://computer20.euro.ru/site/computer20/en/author/communication_eng.htm
Dmitry (SQL50, HTML60)
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hack
Hi, Pgsql-hackers.
> what he's looking for is to somehow
> use XML in lieu of, um, either SQL, PHP, libpq, or something like
> that. (And the fact that those are 4 rather different things reveals
> how confused the matter is.)
http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200802/msg00213.html
Dmitry
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > David Rowley escribi?:
> >
> >> Or is sponsoring a feature paying money to people that already plan to
> >> implement something?
> >
> > Nobody on their mind would plan to implement the features being proposed
> > here ... I didn't look very far
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alvaro Herrera) writes:
> David Rowley escribió:
>
>> Or is sponsoring a feature paying money to people that already plan to
>> implement something?
>
> Nobody on their mind would plan to implement the features being proposed
> here ... I didn't look very far but it seems mainly
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
David Rowley escribió:
Or is sponsoring a feature paying money to people that already plan to
implement something?
Nobody on their mind would plan to implement the features being proposed
here ... I didn't look very far but it seems mainly nonsense.
Yeah, I would have
Joshua D. Drake escribió:
> On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 20:48 +, David Rowley wrote:
> > Josh Berkus Wrote:
> > > >> I would suggest submitting it to pgsql-jobs.
>
> >
> > Apart from the post during a commitfest does this not fit in with the
> > details given here:
> >
> > http://wiki.postgresql.o
David Rowley escribió:
> Or is sponsoring a feature paying money to people that already plan to
> implement something?
Nobody on their mind would plan to implement the features being proposed
here ... I didn't look very far but it seems mainly nonsense.
--
Alvaro Herrera
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 20:48 +, David Rowley wrote:
> Josh Berkus Wrote:
> > >> I would suggest submitting it to pgsql-jobs.
>
> Apart from the post during a commitfest does this not fit in with the
> details given here:
>
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/How_to_sponsor_a_feature
>
> Or is
Josh Berkus Wrote:
> >> I would suggest submitting it to pgsql-jobs.
> >
> > Except that it's not a job offer - it's more of a "solicitation for
> > implementation of something," so I'm not sure that's the right place
> > either.
>
> No, but that's where the right people would see it.
>
> Realist
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 21:21 +0100, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Josh,
>
> > I would note that the individual has been hitting *everyone* directly
> > and via list. So either he is quite serious, doesn't understand
> > etiquette or is a spammer.
>
> I think there is a language barrier at work.
Oh certain
Josh,
I would note that the individual has been hitting *everyone* directly
and via list. So either he is quite serious, doesn't understand
etiquette or is a spammer.
I think there is a language barrier at work.
--Josh
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 21:13 +0100, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Chris Browne wrote:
> No, but that's where the right people would see it.
>
> Realistically, this means most likely contracting with 2nd Quadrant,
> Command Prompt or Peter Eisentraut.
I would note that the individual has been hitting *ev
Chris Browne wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Jonah H. Harris") writes:
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 7:41 PM, Decibel! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think you're barking up the wrong tree here; the community can't really do
hacking for hire. If you want to pay for something to be implemented (which
is great
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Jonah H. Harris") writes:
> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 7:41 PM, Decibel! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I think you're barking up the wrong tree here; the community can't really do
>> hacking for hire. If you want to pay for something to be implemented (which
>> is great!), you'll ne
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 7:41 PM, Decibel! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think you're barking up the wrong tree here; the community can't really do
> hacking for hire. If you want to pay for something to be implemented (which
> is great!), you'll need to talk to companies that do Postgres consulting
I think you're barking up the wrong tree here; the community can't
really do hacking for hire. If you want to pay for something to be
implemented (which is great!), you'll need to talk to companies that
do Postgres consulting. You can find examples on the website and
through google. You cou
Hi, Pgsql-hackers.
Full list of changes of two related projects (SQL5 & HTML6) at current moment
(not reflected in documentation yet).
===terms
master table is table, to primary key of which this (slave) table refers
(terms "master" and "slave" are used only for MTD).
if master table is no
> I had preliminary conversation with my employer about implementation of SQL5
> [1] without "Driven Scene" [2]. He needs concrete budget.
> So i'm asking you to estimate and say, how much will it cost.
> In particular, speach goes about implemention of slides # 17-42, 47-56, 63,
> 102-109, 114-1
Hi, all.
I had preliminary conversation with my employer about implementation of SQL5
[1] without "Driven Scene" [2]. He needs concrete budget.
So i'm asking you to estimate and say, how much will it cost.
In particular, speach goes about implemention of slides # 17-42, 47-56, 63,
102-109, 114-1
20 matches
Mail list logo
