On mån, 2010-11-08 at 10:34 +0900, Hitoshi Harada wrote:
> Hmm, this looks very different from our writeable CTEs. And I can see
> many issues like syntax ambiguity and execution order if we support
> it. AFAIK the most significant reason why we are working on CTEs is
> that CTEs are regarded as so
2010/11/8 Hitoshi Harada :
> 2010/11/9 Hitoshi Harada :
>> 2010/11/8 Pavel Stehule :
>>> 2010/11/8 Hitoshi Harada :
>>
Hmm, this looks very different from our writeable CTEs. And I can see
many issues like syntax ambiguity and execution order if we support
it. AFAIK the most signific
2010/11/9 Hitoshi Harada :
> 2010/11/8 Pavel Stehule :
>> 2010/11/8 Hitoshi Harada :
>
>>> Hmm, this looks very different from our writeable CTEs. And I can see
>>> many issues like syntax ambiguity and execution order if we support
>>> it. AFAIK the most significant reason why we are working on CT
2010/11/8 Pavel Stehule :
> 2010/11/8 Hitoshi Harada :
>> Hmm, this looks very different from our writeable CTEs. And I can see
>> many issues like syntax ambiguity and execution order if we support
>> it. AFAIK the most significant reason why we are working on CTEs is
>> that CTEs are regarded as
2010/11/8 Hitoshi Harada :
> 2010/11/8 Peter Eisentraut :
>> On sön, 2010-11-07 at 21:28 +0900, Hitoshi Harada wrote:
>>> I've read this Peter's post:
>>>
>>> http://petereisentraut.blogspot.com/2010/04/news-from-sql-standard.html
>>>
>>> which says in SQL2011 has a new feature:
>>>
>>> > Combined
2010/11/8 Peter Eisentraut :
> On sön, 2010-11-07 at 21:28 +0900, Hitoshi Harada wrote:
>> I've read this Peter's post:
>>
>> http://petereisentraut.blogspot.com/2010/04/news-from-sql-standard.html
>>
>> which says in SQL2011 has a new feature:
>>
>> > Combined data change and retrieval. PostgreSQL
On sön, 2010-11-07 at 21:28 +0900, Hitoshi Harada wrote:
> I've read this Peter's post:
>
> http://petereisentraut.blogspot.com/2010/04/news-from-sql-standard.html
>
> which says in SQL2011 has a new feature:
>
> > Combined data change and retrieval. PostgreSQL does something like this
> > with
I've read this Peter's post:
http://petereisentraut.blogspot.com/2010/04/news-from-sql-standard.html
which says in SQL2011 has a new feature:
> Combined data change and retrieval. PostgreSQL does something like this with
> RETURNING, but this feature is more elaborate and allows the writing of
