Peter Eisentraut writes:
> SPI was invented before there was proper exception handling, so it
> communicates errors by return values. This makes programming with SPI
> either prone to errors of omission, or very ugly (ultimately, the
> standard reasons why exceptions were invented).
> So I was p
SPI was invented before there was proper exception handling, so it
communicates errors by return values. This makes programming with SPI
either prone to errors of omission, or very ugly (ultimately, the
standard reasons why exceptions were invented).
So I was pondering whether we could introduce
