Re: [HACKERS] SPGiST versus hot standby - question about conflict resolution rules

2012-03-13 Thread Simon Riggs
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:50 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Info appreciated. Email seen, will reply when I can later today. --  Simon Riggs   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/  PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@p

[HACKERS] SPGiST versus hot standby - question about conflict resolution rules

2012-03-12 Thread Tom Lane
There is one more (known) stop-ship problem in SPGiST, which I'd kind of like to get out of the way now before I let my knowledge of that code get swapped out again. This is that SPGiST is unsafe for use by hot standby slaves. The problem comes from "redirect" tuples, which are short-lifespan obj