Re: [HACKERS] SIGSEGV on cvs tip/7.3.2

2003-05-29 Thread Tom Lane
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> There's been some past speculation about putting in a function call >> nesting depth limit, but I haven't been able to think of any reasonable >> way to estimate a safe limit. > GUC variable? Hmm...but that would mean that a normal user cou

Re: [HACKERS] SIGSEGV on cvs tip/7.3.2

2003-05-27 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
> There's been some past speculation about putting in a function call > nesting depth limit, but I haven't been able to think of any reasonable > way to estimate a safe limit. The stack size limit varies a lot across > different platforms, and the amount of stack space consumed per PL > function c