> > >SET SESSION CHARACTERISTICS AS parameter value
> > > is really a more SQL'ish form of the current
> > >SET parameter =/TO value
> > > Perhaps they should be made equivalent, in order to avoid too many subtly
> > > different subversions of the 'SET' command.
> > Hmm. What do you mean b
Thomas Lockhart writes:
> >SET SESSION CHARACTERISTICS AS parameter value
> > is really a more SQL'ish form of the current
> >SET parameter =/TO value
> > Perhaps they should be made equivalent, in order to avoid too many subtly
> > different subversions of the 'SET' command.
>
> Hmm. Wh
>SET SESSION CHARACTERISTICS AS parameter value
> is really a more SQL'ish form of the current
>SET parameter =/TO value
> Perhaps they should be made equivalent, in order to avoid too many subtly
> different subversions of the 'SET' command.
Hmm. What do you mean by "equivalent"? I assum
ISTM that
SET SESSION CHARACTERISTICS parameter value
is really a more SQL'ish form of the current
SET parameter =/TO value
Perhaps they should be made equivalent, in order to avoid too many subtly
different subversions of the 'SET' command.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISTM that
SET SESSION CHARACTERISTICS AS parameter value
is really a more SQL'ish form of the current
SET parameter =/TO value
Perhaps they should be made equivalent, in order to avoid too many subtly
different subversions of the 'SET' command.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED
