> I basically applied your fixes as is, expect for the following items:
> - You replaced
> ! Its providing access controls are not _bypassable_ for any clients ...
>by
> ! The access controls implemented by SE-PostgrSQL may not be _biased_ even
> I wanted to express it is "unavoidable" here,
Sorry, I attached incorrect patch file.
It is the correct one.
KaiGai Kohei wrote:
Robert,
The attached patch is a draft to replace RedHat/Fedora RPM centric
expressions, to add a reference at "Database Roles and Privileges"
chapter and a bit cleanups for the latest revision (r1467).
In the pre
Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:30 AM, KaiGai Kohei wrote:
The patch set of SE-PostgreSQL and related stuff were updated (r1460).
[1/5]
http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql-sepgsql-8.4devel-3-r1460.patch
[2/5]
http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql-utils-8
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:30 AM, KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> The patch set of SE-PostgreSQL and related stuff were updated (r1460).
>
> [1/5]
> http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql-sepgsql-8.4devel-3-r1460.patch
> [2/5]
> http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql-utils-8.4devel-3-r
The patch set of SE-PostgreSQL and related stuff were updated (r1460).
[1/5]
http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql-sepgsql-8.4devel-3-r1460.patch
[2/5]
http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql-utils-8.4devel-3-r1460.patch
[3/5]
http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/sepostgresql
