Re: [HACKERS] Resurrecting some old patches

2006-02-25 Thread Bruce Momjian
OK. --- Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: -- Start of PGP signed section. > On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 10:15:39PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > Aren't they in the 8.2 hold queue that I have not processed yet: > > > > ht

Re: [HACKERS] Resurrecting some old patches

2006-02-25 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 10:15:39PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Aren't they in the 8.2 hold queue that I have not processed yet: > > http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold Hmm yeah. Didn't know about that page. The first is ok but the second no longer applies cleanly to H

Re: [HACKERS] Resurrecting some old patches

2006-02-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
Aren't they in the 8.2 hold queue that I have not processed yet: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold --- Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: -- Start of PGP signed section. > Hi, > > Late last year I pos

[HACKERS] Resurrecting some old patches

2006-02-21 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
Hi, Late last year I posted some patches for psql but they were deferred pending the release of 8.2. However, they are not in the patch queue so I thought I'd bring them up again now the release is done. 1. Dealing with a buggy readline on some platforms w.r.t. --as-needed. The serious arguments