Alvaro Herrera writes:
> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of jue nov 11 19:21:34 -0300 2010:
>> I think that what we need to do is restructure the API of
>> plancache.c to make it more amenable to returning "throwaway" plans.
> I was wondering if this could help with the separation of labour of
>
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of jue nov 11 19:21:34 -0300 2010:
> I've been thinking about supporting automatic replan of cached plans
> using specific parameter values, as has been discussed several times,
> at greatest length in this thread:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010
On 2010-11-11 23:21, Tom Lane wrote:
I've been thinking about supporting automatic replan of cached plans
using specific parameter values, as has been discussed several times,
at greatest length in this thread:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-02/msg00607.php
..
I want to rearr
I've been thinking about supporting automatic replan of cached plans
using specific parameter values, as has been discussed several times,
at greatest length in this thread:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-02/msg00607.php
There doesn't seem to be full consensus about what the cont
