This post is just for closure -- both of the issues below have been
resolved:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:47:35AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > > 1. Cygwin bison needs to be upgraded from 1.35 to 1.75 (i.e.,
> > > 1.50+) to process src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/preproc.y
> > > successfully. I will
Yes, now it is Digital/HP/Compaq.
Updated to existing Tru64 entry.
Ports list updated:
http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html
---
Alessio Bragadini wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 00:40
Dave Page wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@;candle.pha.pa.us]
> > Sent: 05 November 2002 03:18
> > To: Sean Chittenden
> > Cc: Tom Lane; Larry Rosenman; PostgreSQL-development
> > Subject: Re:
On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 00:40, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Ports list updated:
>
> http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html
Please note that you have an entry for Digital Unix and one for Compaq
Tru64 while in fact they are the same OS that went through a whirlwind
of
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@;candle.pha.pa.us]
> Sent: 05 November 2002 03:18
> To: Sean Chittenden
> Cc: Tom Lane; Larry Rosenman; PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
>
>
>
> Port
Ports list updated:
http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html
---
Sean Chittenden wrote:
> > >> Or at least it's *trying* to apply it for 4.7 --- as near as I
> > >> can tell without testing
> >> Or at least it's *trying* to apply it for 4.7 --- as near as I
> >> can tell without testing, the above scrap of resultmap code is
> >> wrong because both of the i.86 lines will match on FreeBSD 4.7,
> >> and I think the pg_regress coding will take the last match.
> >> Larry, did you actually
Ports list updated:
http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html
---
Alessio Bragadini wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 10:22:42AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > I've committed fixes for the oth
Peter,
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 07:36:40PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Dave Page writes:
> > Hackers: As the Cygwin release that is actively supported is the
> > binary distribution that Jason builds, I would think this is OK to
> > be listed as supported if no-one disagrees...
>
> I disagree
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 10:22:42AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I've committed fixes for the other issues too, so CVS tip should now
> pass cleanly on your platform.
I've built the snapshot from CVS tip and now the regression tests pass
with both GCC 2.95.1 and Compaq C V6.4-216 (dtk) on
Digital UNI
Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 09:53, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Or at least it's *trying* to apply it for 4.7 --- as near as I can tell
>> without testing, the above scrap of resultmap code is wrong because both
>> of the i.86 lines will match on FreeBSD 4.7, and I thin
On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 09:53, Tom Lane wrote:
> Sean Chittenden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > $ uname -a
> > FreeBSD avienda.nxad.com 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #1: Mon Oct 28 18:20:14
>PST 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DELLAPTOP i386
>
> > Looks like the only problem on
Sean Chittenden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> $ uname -a
> FreeBSD avienda.nxad.com 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #1: Mon Oct 28 18:20:14 PST
>2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DELLAPTOP i386
> Looks like the only problem on beta3 is that the geometry bits are
> failing, but I'm
I said:
> The alter_table diff is clearly indicative of a bug. Can you set a
> breakpoint and discover exactly where calloc is blowing up?
Never mind, I see it: psql is doing calloc(0) when presented with a
table of zero columns. Surprising you're the first to try it on a
platform where that ret
Alessio Bragadini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 18:53, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Evidently main.c needs "#include " added.
> I wonder what have changed since Beta2 that compiled fine...
That is odd. main.c itself certainly has not changed.
> Done, and now it builds (I've limited
On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 01:57, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> > > >>Seems like someone ought to issue a call for port reports. The
> > > >>"supported platforms" list hasn't been touched ...
> > > > Good point. Thomas, can you take that on?
> > >
> > > No, at least not now. I'm not able to communicate re
On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 18:53, Tom Lane wrote:
> Evidently main.c needs "#include " added.
I wonder what have changed since Beta2 that compiled fine...
> Please add that and see if you get any further.
Done, and now it builds (I've limited the test to native cc compiler for
now). But it doesn't
> > >>Seems like someone ought to issue a call for port reports. The
> > >>"supported platforms" list hasn't been touched ...
> > > Good point. Thomas, can you take that on?
> >
> > No, at least not now. I'm not able to communicate reliably with the
> > mailing lists, and so can not coordinate
Alessio Bragadini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version
>> number please.
> DOESN'T WORK on Digital Unix/Tru64 4.0g, with both cc or gcc compiler.
Evidently main.c needs "#include " added. Please add that and
see if you get any further.
> Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version
> number please.
DOESN'T WORK on Digital Unix/Tru64 4.0g, with both cc or gcc compiler.
Using Compaq C V6.4-216 (dtk) on Digital UNIX V4.0G (Rev. 1530)
Compiler Driver V6.4-013 (dtk) cc Driver:
make[3]: Entering directory
`/usr
I have reviewed your diff and found that it was either timezone changes
or join.sql which I have recently fixed. Can you grab current CVS
snapshot and try again?
---
Ian Barwick wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 October 2002 01:56, Br
Dave Page writes:
> Hackers: As the Cygwin release that is actively supported is the binary
> distribution that Jason builds, I would think this is OK to be listed as
> supported if no-one disagrees...
I disagree. We document as supported those platforms that build out of
the box, not those that
On 29/10/02 1:50 pm, "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Strange. I just got report from another OSX 10.2.1 user saying
>> regression tests passed:
>> 10.2.1, Adam Witney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> The proper value seems to be:
>> 15.3864610140472
>>
Bruce,
Not sure. I know Tom Lane ran a check on 10.1.x and didn't have any
errors, so I figured the differences I saw reflected changes made by
Apple between 10.1.x and 10.2.x. Then, I was surprised when I saw Adam's
report, so I thought perhaps he was running on a PPC G3 and there were
differ
On Tuesday 29 October 2002 01:56, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Sorry, Ian, here is the patch I applied. You can apply this to whatever
> version you are using and test Irix with that, rather than having to
> grab CVS.
OK, I have carried out make check with the updated tests but
got FAILED on the same f
Dave,
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:00:20PM -, Dave Page wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason@;tishler.net]
> > Sent: 29 October 2002 18:58
> >
> > > Hackers: As the Cygwin release that is actively supported is the
> > > binary distribution that Jason buil
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@;candle.pha.pa.us]
> Sent: 29 October 2002 19:34
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
>
>
>
> Attach
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason@;tishler.net]
> Sent: 29 October 2002 18:58
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart;
> Tom Lane; Pgsql-Cygwin
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
&
; > Cc: PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
> >
> >
> >
> > I have updated CVS and re-added getopt.c, now in /port, and
> > updated win32.mak. That should help.
>
> Thanks. Unfortuna
gt; From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason@;tishler.net]
> > Sent: 29 October 2002 14:48
> > To: Dave Page
> > Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart;
> > Tom Lane; Pgsql-Cygwin
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
> >
&g
Dave,
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 04:57:58PM -, Dave Page wrote:
> All regression tests pass with the above hack on:
>
> CYGWIN_NT-5.1 PC9 1.3.14(0.62/3/2) 2002-10-24 10:48 i686 unknown
Thanks for the above.
> Hackers: As the Cygwin release that is actively supported is the
> binary distributio
On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 12:16, Magnus Naeslund(f) wrote:
> Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I noticed that the supported platforms listed 7.2 for linux alpha but
> > with yesterdays date. I figured it was just a typo, but thought I
> > would try to compile myself just to be sure, but I rec
Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I noticed that the supported platforms listed 7.2 for linux alpha but
> with yesterdays date. I figured it was just a typo, but thought I
> would try to compile myself just to be sure, but I received 4
> failures: horology,geometry,opr_sanity, and misc
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason@;tishler.net]
> Sent: 29 October 2002 14:48
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart;
> Tom Lane; Pgsql-Cygwin
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platfo
I noticed that the supported platforms listed 7.2 for linux alpha but
with yesterdays date. I figured it was just a typo, but thought I would
try to compile myself just to be sure, but I received 4 failures:
horology,geometry,opr_sanity, and misc
This is on alpha running debian 3 linux
uname -a
Matthew,
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 10:50:40PM -0500, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> Are you compiling from CVS or from a released tarball?
CVS.
> The bison requirement was recently raised to bison 1.5 or above (1.75
> was recently released also.) This is an issue only when compiling
> from CVS, sin
Dave,
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 08:58:12PM -, Dave Page wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason@;tishler.net]
> > Sent: 28 October 2002 20:42
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
> >
> > On Mon, Oct
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Strange. I just got report from another OSX 10.2.1 user saying
> regression tests passed:
>10.2.1, Adam Witney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The proper value seems to be:
> 15.3864610140472
> or
> 15.3864610140473
> in ./expected/geometry-po
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@;candle.pha.pa.us]
> Sent: 29 October 2002 04:24
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
>
>
>
> I have upd
a.pa.us]
> > Sent: 26 October 2002 03:17
> > To: PostgreSQL-development
> > Cc: Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane
> > Subject: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
> >
> >
> > Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and
> > version numb
> > > Sent: 26 October 2002 03:17
> > > Subject: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
> > >
> > > Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and
> > > version number please.
> >
> > CYGWIN_NT-5.1 PC9 1.3.10(0.51/3/2) 2002-
Ports list updated:
http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html
---
Magnus Naeslund(f) wrote:
> Linux alpha.
>
> An Redhat 6.2, "Linux gsX 2.4.19-pre6 #4 Thu Apr 11 07:17:39 CEST 2002
> alpha
Linux alpha.
An Redhat 6.2, "Linux gsX 2.4.19-pre6 #4 Thu Apr 11 07:17:39 CEST 2002
alpha unknown" (ev56 ruffian).
gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)
./configure \
--prefix=/usr/local/pgsql-7.3b3 \
--with-maxbackends=512 \
--with-tcl \
--without-tk
Strange. I just got report from another OSX 10.2.1 user saying
regression tests passed:
10.2.1, Adam Witney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The proper value seems to be:
15.3864610140472
or
15.3864610140473
in ./expected/geometry-powerpc-darwin.out. Which is it, folks?
-
Ports list updated:
http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html
---
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 05:32:04PM -0500, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> > Solaris 7, 2xUltraSPARC-II 400
Ports list updated:
http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html
---
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 10:17:22PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > OK, Tom will be away next week,
Sorry, Ian, here is the patch I applied. You can apply this to whatever
version you are using and test Irix with that, rather than having to
grab CVS.
---
Neil Conway wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > P
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 05:32:04PM -0500, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> Solaris 7, 2xUltraSPARC-II 400 MHz, 2.5 Gig, gcc 2.95.3; all tests
> pass. Solaris 8 forthcoming.
I should have mentioned that this is for beta 3; I don't have the
necessary bison installed to compile from CVS.
Solaris 8, 2xUltra
On Tuesday 29 October 2002 00:08, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Neil Conway wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Ports list updated:
> >
> > Shouldn't the "join" regression test failure be fixed?
>
> OK, I have updated the join regression test to add ORDER BY in the
> queries Irix di
Neil Conway wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Ports list updated:
>
> Shouldn't the "join" regression test failure be fixed?
OK, I have updated the join regression test to add ORDER BY in the
queries Irix differed. Ian, would you retest the CVS version of
PostgreSQL to see i
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 10:17:22PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> OK, Tom will be away next week, and Thomas will too. I can do it.
> Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version
> number please.
Solaris 7, 2xUltraSPARC-II 400 MHz, 2.5 Gig, gcc 2.95.3; all tests
pass. Solari
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 14:58, Dave Page wrote:
>
> > >
> > > My WAG is that you will be able to upgrade your Cygwin installation
> > > before I fix the Cygwin build issues. :,)
> >
> > I guess my WAG was wrong... :,)
>
> I've been meaning to ask this for a while - what exactly is a WAG? :-)
Wild
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason@;tishler.net]
> Sent: 28 October 2002 20:42
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart;
> Tom Lane; Pgsql-Cygwin
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
>
Dave,
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:20:16AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 02:56:01PM -, Dave Page wrote:
> > Ok, but this is going to take a while as few of the mirrors seem to
> > have this release yet. I also need to download a new set of everything
> > for reasons I won
"Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Horology failures are normal for a day or so on either side
>> of a DST change --- see the "regression tests interpretation"
>> docs. I have no time right now to examine the other diffs.
> The docs say:
> Some of the queries in the timestamp test will
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 10:20, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > > 2. Cygwin bison limit exceeded:
> > >
> > > make[4]: Entering directory
> > > `/home/jt/src/pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc'
> > > [snip]
> > > bison -y -d preproc.y
> > > preproc.y:5560: fatal error: maximum table size (32767) exceeded
Dave,
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 02:56:01PM -, Dave Page wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason@;tishler.net]
> > Sent: 28 October 2002 13:33
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
> >
> > Please try
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@;sss.pgh.pa.us]
> Sent: 28 October 2002 15:53
> To: Jason Tishler
> Cc: Dave Page; Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas
> Lockhart; Pgsql-Cygwin
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platf
>> Make installcheck also failed on horology, copy2 and domain - see
>> attached output.
>>
>> The clocks changed here on Saturday night, so I guess that shouldn't
>> have caused the first error (or should the docs be updated?).
Horology failures are normal for a day or so on either side of a DS
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason@;tishler.net]
> Sent: 28 October 2002 13:33
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart;
> Tom Lane; Pgsql-Cygwin
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
>
I thought the join was part of the timezone change, but I see now that
it is separate. I will fix it by adding ORDER BY.
---
Neil Conway wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Ports list updated:
>
> Should
Dave,
Thanks for the heads up...
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 10:31:00AM -, Dave Page wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@;candle.pha.pa.us]
> > Sent: 26 October 2002 03:17
> > Subject: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
>
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian writes:
>Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version
>number please.
I've checked CVS tip on:
HPUX 10.20, using both gcc and vendor's cc
PPC Linux
Mac OS X 10.1
Here's the regression.diffs file from Mac OS X 10.2.1 (Jaguar). It
faile
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@;candle.pha.pa.us]
> Sent: 26 October 2002 03:17
> To: PostgreSQL-development
> Cc: Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane
> Subject: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
>
>
> Folks. start sending in those p
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@;candle.pha.pa.us]
> Sent: 26 October 2002 03:17
> To: PostgreSQL-development
> Cc: Thomas Lockhart; Tom Lane
> Subject: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
>
>
> Folks. start sending in those p
On an rh6.2, "Linux gsX 2.4.19-pre6 #4 Thu Apr 11 07:17:39 CEST 2002
alpha unknown" (ev56 ruffian) i get this failure.
Should ./configure && gmake && gmake check be the only things
i need to do?
== creating database "regression" ==
/home/mag/d/postgresql/postgresq
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ports list updated:
Shouldn't the "join" regression test failure be fixed?
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our
Ports list updated:
http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html
---
Ian Barwick wrote:
> On Saturday 26 October 2002 04:17, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> >
> > OK, Tom will be away next week, and
On Saturday 26 October 2002 04:17, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> OK, Tom will be away next week, and Thomas will too. I can do it.
> Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version
> number please.
>
> The current platform list is:
>
> http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postg
Ports list updated:
http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html
---
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 04:01:17PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > Updated:
> >
> > http://c
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 04:01:17PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Updated:
>
> http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html
Linux 2.4 on IA32 passes also.
--
Alvaro Herrera ()
"La felicidad no es mañana. La felicidad es ahora"
---(end of
Updated:
http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html
---
Doug McNaught wrote:
> Doug McNaught <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > OK, compile went fine, but I get multiple regression test failu
Updated:
http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html
---
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version
>
Doug McNaught <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OK, compile went fine, but I get multiple regression test failures:
>
> test geometry ... FAILED
After realizing that my disk had filled up (thanks Alvaro) I reran the
tests and 'geometry' is the only failure. I'm guessing this is due to
f
On 26 Oct 2002, Doug McNaught wrote:
> Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Doug McNaught <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > make[3]: Entering directory
>`/home/doug/src/pgsql/src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/ascii_and_mic'
> > > gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declaration
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Doug McNaught <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > make[3]: Entering directory
>`/home/doug/src/pgsql/src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/ascii_and_mic'
> > gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -fpic
> > -I../../../../../../src/include -c
Doug McNaught <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> make[3]: Entering directory
>`/home/doug/src/pgsql/src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs/ascii_and_mic'
> gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -fpic
> -I../../../../../../src/include -c -o ascii_and_mic.o
> ascii_and_mic.c
> ascii_
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version
> > number please.
>
> I've checked CVS tip on:
> HPUX 10.20, using both gcc and vendor's cc
> PPC Linux
> Mac OS X 10.1
I get
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Folks. start sending in those plaform reports, OS name and version
> number please.
I've checked CVS tip on:
HPUX 10.20, using both gcc and vendor's cc
PPC Linux
Mac OS X 10.1
regards, tom lane
--
Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> >>Seems like someone ought to issue a call for port reports. The
> >>"supported platforms" list hasn't been touched ...
> > Good point. Thomas, can you take that on?
>
> No, at least not now. I'm not able to communicate reliably with the
> mailing lists, and so can not
80 matches
Mail list logo
