On Tuesday, 10. July 2001 11:45, you wrote:
> > When a new table or field is created without quotes, it is assumed to be
> > case-insensitive. Herefore I have some questions:
> >
> > - Is it SQL-92-conform to handle >"test"< like >test< without quotes, or
> > shouldn't it be >test< forced to lower
Zeugswetter Andreas SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I do not think the standard states what should happen when you start mixing
> quoted and unquoted identifiers for the same object.
Actually, it does:
13)A and a are equiva-
lent if the of the (with
every
> When a new table or field is created without quotes, it is assumed to be
> case-insensitive. Herefore I have some questions:
>
> - Is it SQL-92-conform to handle >"test"< like >test< without quotes, or
> shouldn't it be >test< forced to lowercase?
I do not understand this question. If you wan
Hi all,
because no one noticed my last question, please forgive me this repost, but I
promised my boss to get an answer to this questions.
Here they are:
When a new table or field is created without quotes, it is assumed to be
case-insensitive. Herefore I have some questions:
- Is it SQL-92-c
