On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:34:25AM -0600, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> > Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >> from postgresql.conf.sample:
> >>
> >> #replication_timeout = 60s # in milliseconds; 0 disables
> >>
> >> Seconds or milliseconds? I would suggest we just remove the "in
>
Magnus Hagander writes:
> from postgresql.conf.sample:
> #replication_timeout = 60s# in milliseconds; 0 disables
> Seconds or milliseconds? I would suggest we just remove the "in
> milliseconds", and instead say "timeout for replication connections; 0
> disables".
That would take away any in
Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> from postgresql.conf.sample:
>>
>> #replication_timeout = 60s # in milliseconds; 0 disables
>>
>> Seconds or milliseconds? I would suggest we just remove the "in
>> milliseconds", and instead say "timeout for replication
>> connections; 0 di
On 20 December 2011 13:38, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> from postgresql.conf.sample:
>
> #replication_timeout = 60s # in milliseconds; 0 disables
>
> Seconds or milliseconds? I would suggest we just remove the "in
> milliseconds", and instead say "timeout for replication connections; 0
> disables
from postgresql.conf.sample:
#replication_timeout = 60s # in milliseconds; 0 disables
Seconds or milliseconds? I would suggest we just remove the "in
milliseconds", and instead say "timeout for replication connections; 0
disables".
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: h
