On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Peter Eisentraut (pete...@gmx.net) wrote:
>> On 11/4/13, 8:58 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 5:57 AM, Michael Paquier
>> > wrote:
>> >>> Please find attached a patch doing what is written in the $subject.
>> >> With the
* Peter Eisentraut (pete...@gmx.net) wrote:
> On 11/4/13, 8:58 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 5:57 AM, Michael Paquier
> > wrote:
> >>> Please find attached a patch doing what is written in the $subject.
> >> With the documentation updated, this is even better...
> >
> > I'm un
On 11/4/13, 8:58 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 5:57 AM, Michael Paquier
> wrote:
>>> Please find attached a patch doing what is written in the $subject.
>> With the documentation updated, this is even better...
>
> I'm unconvinced that there's any value in this.
Yeah, the only
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 5:57 AM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
>> Please find attached a patch doing what is written in the $subject.
> With the documentation updated, this is even better...
I'm unconvinced that there's any value in this.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Ent
> Please find attached a patch doing what is written in the $subject.
With the documentation updated, this is even better...
Regards,
--
Michael
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/backup.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/backup.sgml
index ccb76d8..0f20253 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/backup.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/backup.sg
Hi all,
Following the discussions done these last days about wal_level like this one:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/cabuevewigm-ppobkgdkm6lzyo+ovrdz7soxn_5by8e8pcae...@mail.gmail.com
Please find attached a patch doing what is written in the $subject.
Thoughts?
--
Michael
commit 5a06f45ca8
